Response to Classmates’ contribution an Example by

Response to Classmates’ contribution to Hinduism and Chinese Art Abstract Need essay sample on "Response to Classmates contribution to Hinduism and Chinese Art" topic? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you Proceed My appreciation for and understanding of Hinduism and Chinese Art increased manifold when I read the comments of my classmates on Hinduism and Chinese Art. The oldest religion, Hinduism, is a combination of many beliefs and philosophies coming together and manifesting in the worship of many forms of Gods and Goddesses. From the commentary of my classmates, I also realized that the Chinese Art, one of the oldest, remains refreshingly new even today. The intricate designs and combination of colors is a feast to the eye. Our Customers Usually Tell EssayLab specialists: Can somebody complete my type essay? Click On Order Button And Get Ready To Be Amazed Hinduism The description of Traditional Hinduism exhibit in Smithsonians Sackler and Freer galleries in the words of my classmates, is very enlightening. Though I heard about Hinduism earlier, it is the first time that I have read and understood more about it. It is the worlds oldest and the third largest religion. It was born in India and originated from numerous religious beliefs and philosophies. The religion is based on the idea of reincarnation, or coming back in a different life form. In Hinduism they believe in polytheism, the term commonly used to describe the worship of or belief in more than one deity, especially several deities. I was intrigued with the number of gods and goddesses within Hindu religion. In my reading the numbers is in excess of three hundred million. Why is there a need for all these gods and goddesses? The different gods and goddesses represent different functions. Based on what an individual needed assistance with he or she would pray to that god or goddess. The most supreme of these gods and goddesses is Brahman, the Supreme Cosmic Spirit; known as the Absolute God of Hinduism. Some of the other gods include Devi, the divine female also known as the Mother of Goodness. Ganesha the beloved elephant face deity that clears all obstacles; Shiva the Destroyer, and Vishnu, the all prevailing, the protector of the world and the restorer of moral order. The history and practice of Hinduism is rather interesting and a religion that I would like to investigate further. Chinese Art My classmates written contribution on Chinese Art was quite an eye opener and makes me want to see these articles in person! One of the things that immediately appealed to me was the diversity of the materials they used. They ranged from jades, to bronzes, to ceramic, lacquer and even glass. I could easily compare my own observations of Chinese Art used in various types of artwork such as sculptures, dishes, furniture and paintings. They seemed to range from everyday common uses to showpiece designs. It was evident that many of these articles were works of art even during the time they were created. Once I saw the artwork, I immediately compared the Chinese artisans to other cultures and civilizations and felt they created more beautiful and intricate artwork than some of the other civilizations of their time. It also appeared that they made efforts to employ various techniques in the use of the materials they worked with. This led me to wonder if they were indeed a more advanced civilization than others around the world. The Chinese Art looks just as beautiful now as it did thousands of years ago. Many objects have withstood the test of time and we are fortunate to have many of these pieces available for our enjoyment and wonderment. I agree with the contributions of my classmates on Hinduism and Chinese Art. References Smithsonian Institution(2008). What are the basic beliefs of Hinduism. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from http://www.asia.si.edu/ Smithsonian Institution(2008). Chinese Art. Retrieved May 1, 2008.

Gmo Lab Report Essay Example

Gmo Lab Report Essay Example Gmo Lab Report Paper Gmo Lab Report Paper At this rate, Genetically Modified Organisms within food products will increase dramatically, but is this for the best? There are many sis factors that have been brought up with genetically modified foods such as potential increase of cancer according to a French study conducted by Dry. Giles Eric Israelis (Kalmia, 2012). Genetically modified food is a popular subject among scientists, as it has been researched quite often. A study was done in the Czech Republic over a course of five years (2002-2007) to test many foods, such as tomatoes and rice, for approved and unapproved Genetically Modified Organisms. Similar to the experiment conducted in the botany lab, the scientists involved in this study used a Polymerase Chain Reaction, or PC, method to determine their results Karol, Story, Localization, Rubrics, 2010). Enrich Dainties and his partners did another similar study, on soybeans specifically. Like our experiment conducted on the cornbread mix, Dainties and his colleagues followed their PC results with an Agrees Gel Electrophoresis (Dainties, Angelic, De Saints, Macaroon and Contain, 2004). An additional experiment closely related to the one performed by my partners and I is a study done in Brazil to better detect for GUM within their foods sold in markets a other places (Cardinally, Branching, Ferreira, dad Cruz and Gemmed, 2005). These articles show how GUM within odds are present all over the world. The reason my fellow group members and myself are conducting this experiment is to test a sample of processed food (in this case cornbread mix) for any existence of Genetically Modified Organisms using PC methods. : We hypothesize that the cornbread mixture has been genetically modified and therefore will show that in the results. Materials and Methods The purpose of this experiment is to use PC method to identify genetically modified foods. During the experiment we, as a group, tested a known non- GUM food sample, oatmeal, along with our cornbread mix. We first weighed out 0. 77 g f the non- GUM oatmeal. We then proceeded to add 3. 85 ml (5. 00 ml per 1. 00 g) of distilled water (DEW) to the oatmeal and ground them together with a pestle. The same was done with 0. 99 g of the cornbread mix and 4. 95 ml of DEW. We pipettes each of these into separate screw-cap tubes consisting of 500 1 of an Instigate solution. These we incubated and centrifuged for approximately 5 minutes each. We then took six PC tubes and filled them each up, 2 with the non- GUM oatmeal mixture, 2 with the cornbread mixture and 2 with a known GUM positive substance. The Non- GUM and GUM positives served as controls for the experiment. One of each of the two tubes contained 20 1 of plant MM and GUM MM. The PC tubes were then placed in a thermal cycled and after this we did an agrees gel electrophoresis to provide us with the necessary data received from bands that shouldve shown up n the gel. Results Even though we had followed procedure and accurately mixed the correct amount and type of DNA and Master Mix together, as shown in Table 1, we ended up getting shocking results. Photos were taken of the final gel slab the morning of the experiment (Fig. 1) and that same afternoon (Fig. 2). There seemed to be very little signs, if any, of Genetically Modified Organisms within he cornbread mixture. TABLE 1. PC Tube Contents: Tube Number I Master Mix I DANA | 20 1 Plant MM (green) | 20 1 Non- GUM food control DNA | 2 | 20 1 GUM MM (red) | 20 1 Non- GUM food control DNA 3 | 20 1 Plant MM (green) | 20 1 test food DNA I 4 | 201 GUM MM (red)1 20 1 test food DNA I 5 | 20 1 Plant MM (green) | 20 1 GUM positive control DNA | 6 | 20 GUM MM (red)1 201 GUM positive control DNA I FIGURE 1 . GUM Morning (AM) Agrees Gel Electrophoresis results FIGURE 2. GUM Evening (PM) Agrees Gel Electrophoresis results Discussion: The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether or not a sample of n off-brand cornbread mix had contained Genetically Modified Organisms (GUM). As a result, we determined that there were no GUM traces located in the cornbread mix. This could be due to mistakes that may have been made during the procedure such as poor measuring or mixing, misreading results, or the cornbread mix really was not made with genetically modified foods. These results disprove our hypothesis, which stated that we believed there would be GUM traces found within the cornbread mix. It was disappointing to see that we had a negative result while many of the other groups received bold nines on their rag gel indicating that their foods contained high amounts of GUM. I was glad to see that not all processed foods contain it though as in with the results of the Czech Republic study. Out of all the tomatoes and papayas they tested, not one had resulted in the detection of GUM traces (Karol, Story, Localization, Rubrics, 2010). We knew that the gel was accurately detecting GUM traces in foods by using the GUM positive control. Also to back up our assumptions that the Agrees Gel Electrophoresis results are accurate, it is shown in Adenines, and others, work. He used this method of GUM detection in is study to show that this is an effective way of detecting GUM traces (Dainties, Angelic, De Saints, Macaroon and Contain, 2004). It is interesting to see how genealogical modified foods are not only in the US but also in the Czech Republic and even in Brazil markets, where Cardinally and his associates looked into Roundup Ready soybeans and checked other substances for GUM traces (Cardinally, Branching, Ferreira, dad Cruz and Gemmed, 2005). Though I was disappointed to get negative results, I am happy that there was a variety in GUM traces within the whole lab. I dont know if we would have learned much if we all got positive results. It would cause us to just assume that all processed foods have been genetically altered.

Evaluation of Theoretic Structure of Research Paper Term

Evaluation of Theoretic Structure of Research - Term Paper Example sideration of outcomes of the experiment conducted, the authors concluded that conducted imaginary interventions contributed significantly to the reduction of patients’ depression, anxiety, and stress, and improved their comfort. To confirm the statement it is enough to consider the quantity of psychiatric inpatients all over the world: according to the report ‘Mental Health Policy and Practice across Europe: The future direction of mental health care’, approximately 450 million of population undergoes various types of mental disorders at any point of time (Knapp, McDaid, Mossialos, and Thornicroft, 2007). It is not a rare situation when people with mood disorders need to repeat their treatment for several times and although hospitalization provides them with some kind of refuge, it also implies certain limitations on patients’ freedom. Moreover, hospitalization could also cause extra discomfort in addition to that, which is invoked by the illness itself. Taking into account that GI interventions might ease patients’ depression, anxiety and stress factors and improve their health, the method influences essentially on the whole success of mental disorders treatment (Shapiro, 2003). Implementation of nursing should be grounded on relevant theories and is aimed to provide psychiatric inpatients with the highest possible level of comfort in order to help them to be full-fledged members of society. Regarding the fact that Comfort Theory application relieves patients reduce their depression, anxiety, and stress and increase their comfort, the method is an important element of nursing process. The main purpose of the paper is to examine the effects of GI interventions recorded on compact discs (CDs) on psychiatric patients’ mental health and test the Null hypothesis, which states that people with mood disorders, who receive GI interventions, would perceive higher comfort level and lower stress and nervousness. Relief is defined as a state when certain